SWT is soon to become largely an archaic waste of time for most apps, now that Sun have started the move to using OpenGL to render Swing, although without it eclipse would be noticeably less snappy on older JVM's like 1.4.2. Things get a little hairy when I run two or three completely separate copies of eclipse simultaneously + mozilla and other stuff (I have to remember not to switch windows to any of the other apps otherwise linux's shitty badly written virtual-mem managmenet gets its knickers in a twist and thrases hte HD for minutes, and then will repeate later for *no apparent reason*).īut to put into perspective, it is MORE responsive to have a pair of eclipse isntances 100MB usage each (modulo shared mem and prior to GC) than it is to have a single copy of mozilla browsing a single webpage (mozilla is a few tens of milliseconds slow and non-smooth at scrolling etc - you notice if you're used to the snappiness of modern games :)).Įclipse is hugely dependent on teh proprietary native code SWT system, which is probably your problem. More usefully, it's fine on my 1Ghz 256Mb linux laptop. I tried searching a couple of times but kept getting an error. Sorry if this has been addressed on the forum before. So if anyone else is having trouble getting Eclipse to work well on their Mac jBuilder is a nice alternative.īy the way.
jBuilder has some of the neat features that Eclipse has like code folding, Code insight (autocomplete) and correcting syntax errors on the fly. In the mean time I've swithced to Borland's jBuilder 2005 Foundation. I wouldn't mind giving eclipse another try if it could run decently on my mac.
I was just curious if anyone else has had a similar problem or if there is a solution. I trashed it after about half an hour of trying to use it. Shouldn't my powerbook be fast enough to run this program? It was slow to compile, slow to accept keystrokes when typing and worst of all, It was extremely slow when resizing any of the frames. I tried Eclipse about a month ago on my 1.33 GHz PowerBook G4 with 512 MB Ram and it was so slow I couldn't bare it. I renamed the folder to eclipsecpp. It will create an folder eclipse in your download folder. The download will put Eclipse as a tar-file eclipse-cpp-luna-SR1-macosx-cocoa-x8664.tar in your download folder.
#Eclipse os x links folder mac os x
Choose the correct version, in my case Mac OS X 64 bit. p2 folder to a central location and changed the eclipse.ini file (embedded in a folder under the eclipse.app folder) to point to the correct location. Now you need to download Eclipse IDE for C/C++ developers. So either other users would need at least read access to some locations in your account, or you moved your.
#Eclipse os x links folder install
Hello, I've been browsing this Java Development forum a lot lately and noticed that just about everyone recomends Eclipse. This is true no matter where you install eclipse, with the installer.
0 kommentar(er)
